newspaper
indictment
1:26-cr-00043-1 USA v. Robinson
26-cr-00043
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
In this criminal matter, the United States is prosecuting Robinson under docket number 26-cr-00043. The current summary references a sentencing proceeding, suggesting that the case has progressed through trial or plea and is at the stage of imposing penalties. Specific details about the offense or sentence are not provided.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
20 events
Coverage
20 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Criminal sentencing
- • Judicial discretion
- • Sentencing guidelines
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
5 events
groups
Hearing
3 days ago
A hearing was scheduled in the case of USA v. Pues et al, which is related to the broader legal proceedings involving USA v. Robinson. This hearing is an official court event where parties will present arguments or updates. It matters becau
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Notice of Hearing
Open original open_in_new
groups
Hearing
3 days ago
A hearing was scheduled in the case of USA v. Crossley, as indicated by the notice of hearing. This means the court set a specific date to discuss matters related to the case. Scheduling hearings is a key step in moving a case forward throu
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Notice of Hearing
Open original open_in_new
edit_note
Motion
3 days ago
In the case USA v. Robinson, a motion was filed related to another case, USA v. McKinney. This indicates that legal arguments or requests are being made that may affect proceedings in one or both cases. Such motions can influence the direct
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motion Filed ( 57
Open original open_in_new
verified
Verdict
3 days ago
In the case USA v. Barnes, the court received the sentencing submission, which is a document outlining the arguments and recommendations for the defendant's punishment. This step is crucial as it helps the judge decide the appropriate sente
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Sentencing Submission ( 115
Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order
3 days ago
In the case of USA v. Robinson, the court issued an order related to a motion to continue, which means a request to delay the proceedings was considered. This affects the timeline of the case and can impact how quickly the case moves forwar
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion to Continue
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
article
Analysis & Coverage
Advertisement
Case Timeline
20 events
info
Other
April 16, 2026
2:26-cr-00043-1 USA v. Baxter
In a legal proceeding titled 'USA v. Robinson', the court has granted an extension of time for a matter related to the case 'USA v. Baxter'. This extension allows for additional time to prepare and present arguments, ensuring a fair and thorough legal process.
groups
Hearing
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00046-2 USA v. Pues et al
A hearing was scheduled in the case of USA v. Pues et al, which is related to the broader legal proceedings involving USA v. Robinson. This hearing is an official court event where parties will present arguments or updates. It matters because hearings are critical steps in moving the case forward and resolving legal issues.
groups
Hearing
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00033-1 USA v. Crossley
A hearing was scheduled in the case of USA v. Crossley, as indicated by the notice of hearing. This means the court set a specific date to discuss matters related to the case. Scheduling hearings is a key step in moving a case forward through the legal process.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00004-1 USA v. HERBERT
A conference was held in the case USA v. Robinson, which is related to another case, USA v. Herbert. This meeting likely involved discussions between the judge and attorneys to address procedural matters or case progress. Such conferences help manage the case efficiently and prepare for upcoming steps.
edit_note
Motion
April 15, 2026
1:24-cr-00003-1 USA v. McKinney
In the case USA v. Robinson, a motion was filed related to another case, USA v. McKinney. This indicates that legal arguments or requests are being made that may affect proceedings in one or both cases. Such motions can influence the direction or outcome of the trials.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
5:26-cr-00045-1 USA v. Wilford Tomasini
In the case of USA v. Wilford Tomasini, the court addressed the issue of bond and set specific conditions for release. This means the court decided whether Tomasini could be released from custody before trial and under what terms. This step is crucial as it affects the defendant's freedom and the court's control over their behavior while awaiting trial.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00074-1 USA v. Williams
In the case USA v. Robinson, an event labeled as 'other' occurred, which references another case, USA v. Williams. This suggests a procedural or administrative action linking the two cases, possibly for coordination or comparison purposes.
verified
Verdict
April 15, 2026
1:21-cr-00433-1 USA v. Barnes
In the case USA v. Barnes, the court received the sentencing submission, which is a document outlining the arguments and recommendations for the defendant's punishment. This step is crucial as it helps the judge decide the appropriate sentence based on the facts and legal guidelines. The event marks a key moment moving the case closer to resolution.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00053-1 USA v. Kutzko
In the case of USA v. Robinson, the court issued an order related to a motion to continue, which means a request to delay the proceedings was considered. This affects the timeline of the case and can impact how quickly the case moves forward. The order ensures that the court's schedule and the parties' rights are managed properly.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00036-1 USA v. Fuller
In the case USA v. Robinson, the court issued an order related to a motion to amend or correct a previous filing in a separate but related case, USA v. Fuller. This order addresses procedural adjustments that may impact the progress or details of the legal proceedings. Such orders ensure that the court records accurately reflect the parties' positions and any necessary corrections are officially recognized.
edit_note
Pleading
April 15, 2026
1:25-cr-00036-1 USA v. Palomeque-Ramos
In the case USA v. Palomeque-Ramos, the court issued a document outlining the findings of fact and recommendations regarding the defendant's guilty plea. This means the judge reviewed the evidence and circumstances to confirm the plea is appropriate and suggested how the case should proceed. This step is crucial to ensure the plea is entered knowingly and voluntarily.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:24-cr-00431-1 USA v. KOTLER
In the case USA v. Robinson, the court issued a consent order related to the separate case USA v. Kotler. This means both parties agreed to certain terms without further dispute, and the court formally approved this agreement. Such orders help resolve issues efficiently without prolonged litigation.
groups
Hearing
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-10010-1 USA v. Rosemary Parks
In the case of USA v. Rosemary Parks, a Rule 11 hearing was held. This type of hearing is where the court ensures that the defendant fully understands the charges and the rights they are waiving by pleading guilty. It matters because it protects the defendant's rights and ensures any plea is made voluntarily and knowingly.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:25-cr-00030-1 USA v. MARSHALL
A court issued an order related to the case USA v. Marshall, which is connected to the ongoing proceedings in USA v. Robinson. This order likely addresses procedural or substantive matters that could impact how the cases proceed. Understanding this order helps clarify the legal steps being taken and their potential effects on the defendants.
edit_note
Pleading
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00064-1 USA v. Tovar-Olibares
In the case USA v. Tovar-Olibares, a plea agreement was filed, meaning the defendant has agreed to plead guilty to certain charges, potentially in exchange for a lighter sentence or other considerations. This step often helps resolve the case without going to trial, saving time and resources for the court and the parties involved.
groups
Hearing
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00031-1 USA v. SMITH
In the case USA v. Robinson, a hearing was held to officially end the proceedings related to the case USA v. Smith. This means that the court has concluded its review or actions concerning the Smith case, which may impact related matters in the Robinson case.
edit_note
Motion
April 15, 2026
1:25-cr-00204-1 USA v. SCHUSTER
In the case USA v. Robinson, a letter motion was filed, referencing a related case, USA v. Schuster. This motion is a formal request to the court, possibly seeking a ruling or action related to the matters in these cases. Such motions are important as they can influence the direction or outcome of the trial.
edit_note
Pleading
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00059-1 USA v. Cruz-Zolano
In the case USA v. Cruz-Zolano, a plea agreement was filed, meaning the defendant has agreed to plead guilty to certain charges, likely in exchange for a lighter sentence or other considerations. This step often helps resolve the case without a trial, saving time and resources for the court and the parties involved.
verified
Verdict
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00048-1 USA v. PRADO SCATARZI
In the case of USA v. Prado Scatarzi, the court reached a verdict and proceeded with sentencing. This means the judge has decided the defendant's guilt and is now determining the appropriate punishment. The sentencing phase is crucial as it finalizes the legal consequences for the defendant.
description
Filing
April 15, 2026
1:26-cr-00043-1 USA v. Robinson
The indictment against Robinson in the case USA v. Robinson was made public by unsealing it. This means the formal charges have been officially revealed, allowing the case to proceed in court. It marks the start of the legal process against the defendant.
Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper
20 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 20 articles
Timeline events
20 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 16 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.