legal-news

Pilshchikov et al v. Chukhray et al

25-cv-13989
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Pilshchikov et al v. Chukhray et al, docket 25-cv-13989, is a civil case where the court has issued an order granting an extension of time to answer. This procedural development allows the defendants additional time to respond to the complaint, impacting the litigation timeline.

Latest development

1:25-cv-13989 Pilshchikov et al v. Chukhray et al

Order · April 15, 2026

The court issued an order regarding a request to extend the deadline for the defendants to file their answer in the case Pilshchikov et al v. Chukhray et al. This means the defendants asked for more time to respond to the complaint, and the court has made a decision on that request. Granting an extension can affect the timeline of the case and how quickly it moves forward.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Extension of time
  • Response deadline
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 15, 2026

1:25-cv-13989 Pilshchikov et al v. Chukhray et al

The court issued an order regarding a request to extend the deadline for the defendants to file their answer in the case Pilshchikov et al v. Chukhray et al. This means the defendants asked for more time to respond to the complaint, and the court has made a decision on that request. Granting an extension can affect the timeline of the case and how quickly it moves forward.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 18 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.