1:25-cv-13130 Nathan P. Goldstein v. Franny's Construction Company, Inc. et al
Case Summary
In this civil matter, the docket reflects a motion for an extension of time, likely related to a procedural deadline such as filing pleadings or discovery. The parties appear to be negotiating or requesting additional time to comply with court-imposed schedules. Extensions can indicate complexity or unforeseen delays in the case, affecting the pace of litigation. The court's ruling on this motion will influence the timeline and potentially the strategy of the involved parties.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
1 event
Coverage
1 article
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Extension of time
- • Procedural deadlines
- • Case scheduling
update What Changed This Week
Case Timeline
1 event1:25-cv-13130 Nathan P. Goldstein v. Franny's Construction Company, Inc. et al
In the case of Nathan P. Goldstein versus Franny's Construction Company and others, the court granted an extension of time. This means one party was given more time to meet a deadline, such as filing documents or responding to court orders. Extensions can affect the pace of the case and allow for more thorough preparation.