1:25-cv-11330 Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Case Summary
Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security, docket number 25-cv-11330, is a civil case involving a consent to jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge. This procedural step allows the magistrate judge to oversee the case, which likely concerns social security benefits or administrative appeals.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
24 events
Coverage
24 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Social Security appeal
- • Consent to magistrate jurisdiction
- • Administrative law
update What Changed This Week
Analysis & Coverage
Case Timeline
20 events9:25-cv-81523 Seeley v. Commissioner of Social Secuirty
In a legal memorandum, the court addressed the case of Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security and Seeley v. Commissioner of Social Security, providing insights into the legal proceedings and potential implications for the parties involved.
3:26-cv-05343 Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
In a legal case involving the Commissioner of Social Security, Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security, a notice of appearance was filed by Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security, case 3:26-cv-05343, indicating that the latter party intends to participate in the proceedings.
2:25-cv-02757 ASADURIAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In a legal case involving the Commissioner of Social Security, the plaintiffs submitted their reply brief, which is a response to the arguments presented by the defendant. This document outlines the plaintiffs' final position and addresses the key points raised by the other side.
3:25-cv-10518 Dang v. Commissioner of Social Security
In a legal proceeding between Perez and the Commissioner of Social Security, a stipulation and proposed order were submitted, specifically in relation to the case Dang v. Commissioner of Social Security.
1:26-cv-04025 WALLENBURG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In a legal case involving Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security and Wallenburg v. Commissioner of Social Security, a court hearing took place to address issues related to Social Security benefits and potential entitlements. The outcome of this event could have significant implications for the recipients of Social Security benefits and the interpretation of eligibility criteria.
1:20-cv-06785 Kimbrough v. Commissioner of Social Security
In a legal case involving Social Security benefits, Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security and Kimbrough v. Commissioner of Social Security, a court hearing took place. The outcome of these cases could have significant implications for individuals receiving Social Security benefits, potentially affecting the eligibility criteria or benefit amounts.
3:25-cv-05378 Greene v. Commissioner of Social Security
In a legal case involving a declaration, Greene v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court heard arguments and evidence related to a matter that requires further clarification. The outcome of this event could have implications for the interpretation of social security regulations.
3:20-cv-15564 FORREST v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In a legal case involving the Commissioner of Social Security, Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security and Forrest v. Commissioner of Social Security, a court event took place that may have implications for social security benefits and the interpretation of related regulations.
2:25-cv-18121 POSSO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In a legal case involving plaintiffs Perez and Posso, a brief was submitted with 9 pages of arguments and evidence. The purpose of this document is to present their side of the story and provide the necessary information for the court to make an informed decision.
1:25-cv-10151 Collins Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
In a legal dispute between Perez and the Commissioner of Social Security, as well as Collins Moore and the same Commissioner, attorney fees were a significant point of contention. The case, identified as 1:25-cv-11330 Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security and 1:25-cv-10151 Collins Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security, highlights the complexities surrounding attorney fees in legal proceedings.
2:26-cv-03805 BEKIT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In a legal case involving the Social Security Administration (SSA), Summons was issued against Commissioner BEKIT in the Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security and BEKIT v. Commissioner of Social Security cases.
3:25-cv-06068 Debusk v. Commissioner of Social Security
In a legal case involving the Commissioner of Social Security, Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security, and a related case Debusk v. Commissioner of Social Security, a court event took place that has significant implications for social security benefits and eligibility criteria.
2:26-cv-03843 FREEMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In a legal case involving pro se filers, Freeman v. Commissioner of Social Security, a notice outlining guidelines for individuals representing themselves in Social Security matters was issued. This event is significant as it provides clarity and direction for self-represented litigants navigating the complex Social Security system.
3:25-cv-06010 Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security, a reply brief was filed. This document responds to arguments made by the opposing party, aiming to clarify or reinforce the filer’s position. Such briefs are important as they help the court understand the key points of dispute before making a decision.
3:25-cv-05802 Kerns v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Kerns v. Commissioner of Social Security, a reply brief was filed, which is a response to the opposing party's arguments. This step is part of the legal process where each side presents their points to support their position. It matters because the reply brief can clarify issues and influence the court's decision.
2:25-cv-16907 CHUMPITAZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In the case of Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security, the plaintiffs submitted their reply brief in response to previous filings. This step is part of the legal process where the plaintiffs address arguments made by the defendant, aiming to strengthen their position. It matters because it helps the court understand the plaintiffs' perspective before making a decision.
2:24-cv-11391 NEVINS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In the case Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security, the defendants submitted their response brief in a related case, Nevins v. Commissioner of Social Security. This document presents the defendants' arguments and defenses in response to the plaintiff's claims. It matters because the response brief is a critical step in the legal process, influencing how the court evaluates the case.
1:25-cv-12006 Valenzuela v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case Valenzuela v. Commissioner of Social Security, there was an event related to attorney fees. This likely involves the court addressing the payment or approval of legal fees for the attorney representing one of the parties. Such decisions impact how attorneys are compensated for their work in Social Security cases.
1:25-cv-03932 Marsh v. Commissioner of Social Security
In the case of Marsh v. Commissioner of Social Security, a declaration was filed to support a motion. This document provides important information or evidence that backs up the request made to the court. Such filings help the judge understand the reasons behind the motion and decide whether to grant it.
3:25-cv-06114 Kamalu-Edlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
A new case titled Kamalu-Edlin v. Commissioner of Social Security was filed, separate from the existing Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security case. This indicates another individual is challenging a decision made by the Social Security Administration. It matters because it shows ongoing disputes over Social Security decisions requiring judicial review.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
9:25-cv-81523 Seeley v. Commissioner of Social Secuirty
Memorandum ( 15
3:26-cv-05343 Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Notice of Appearance ( 4
2:25-cv-02757 ASADURIAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiffs Reply Brief ( 9
3:25-cv-10518 Dang v. Commissioner of Social Security
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 12
1:26-cv-04025 WALLENBURG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
1:20-cv-06785 Kimbrough v. Commissioner of Social Security
3:25-cv-05378 Greene v. Commissioner of Social Security
Declaration ( 23
3:20-cv-15564 FORREST v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
2:25-cv-18121 POSSO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiffs Brief ( 9
1:25-cv-10151 Collins Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
Attorney Fees ( 18
2:26-cv-03805 BEKIT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Summons Issued SSA ( 3
3:25-cv-06068 Debusk v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:26-cv-03843 FREEMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Notice of Guidelines for Pro Se Filers ( 2
3:25-cv-06010 Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
Brief - Reply ( 16
3:25-cv-05802 Kerns v. Commissioner of Social Security
Brief - Reply ( 23
2:25-cv-16907 CHUMPITAZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiffs Reply Brief ( 9
2:24-cv-11391 NEVINS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendants Response Brief ( 9
1:25-cv-12006 Valenzuela v. Commissioner of Social Security
Attorney Fees ( 22
1:25-cv-03932 Marsh v. Commissioner of Social Security
Declaration in Support of Motion ( 20