Henry v. Anzley et al
Case Summary
In Henry v. Anzley et al, the court has referred the case to a magistrate judge for further proceedings. This referral typically involves pretrial matters such as discovery disputes or settlement discussions, indicating active case management.
Latest development
1:25-cv-08380 Henry v. Anzley et al
Order · April 15, 2026
The court issued an order referring the case Henry v. Anzley et al to a magistrate judge. This means that certain pretrial matters or proceedings will be handled by the magistrate judge to help manage the case efficiently. It is a routine step that helps streamline the judicial process.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Magistrate judge referral
- • Pretrial management
- • Case progression
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge ( 22
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
2 events3:25-cv-12959 STANLEY v. STANLEY et al
In the case Stanley v. Stanley et al, a notice of settlement was filed by the attorney, indicating that the parties have reached an agreement to resolve the dispute outside of court. This means the case is likely to be dismissed or resolved without further litigation. Such settlements help save time and resources for both the court and the parties involved.
1:25-cv-08380 Henry v. Anzley et al
The court issued an order referring the case Henry v. Anzley et al to a magistrate judge. This means that certain pretrial matters or proceedings will be handled by the magistrate judge to help manage the case efficiently. It is a routine step that helps streamline the judicial process.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-08380 Henry v. Anzley et al
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge ( 22
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 17 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.