1:25-cv-04356 The New York Times Company et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Case Summary
The New York Times Company et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a civil case identified by docket 25-cv-04356. A proposed order for substitution of attorney has been filed, indicating changes in legal representation. No further details about the claims or case issues are provided. The involvement of a media company and a government agency suggests potential issues related to public records or administrative law, but specifics are not available.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
3 events
Coverage
3 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Substitution of attorney proposed
- • Parties include media company and government agency
- • Civil litigation
update What Changed This Week
Case Timeline
3 events1:24-cv-07290 American Civil Liberties Union Foundation et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
In the case involving The New York Times Company against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), another related case titled American Civil Liberties Union Foundation versus ICE was noted. This indicates ongoing legal challenges against ICE by multiple parties, highlighting the agency's contested actions. Understanding these related cases helps track broader legal scrutiny of ICE's policies and practices.
1:25-cv-03357 DARK MODE LLC d/b/a 404 MEDIA v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
In the case titled DARK MODE LLC d/b/a 404 MEDIA versus United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a status report was filed to update the court on the progress or current state of the case. Such reports help the court monitor ongoing developments and ensure the case proceeds efficiently. This update is part of routine case management to keep all parties informed.
1:25-cv-04356 The New York Times Company et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
In the case between The New York Times Company and the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the court issued an order approving the substitution of an attorney. This means that one lawyer is officially replacing another in representing a party in the lawsuit. Such changes are routine but important to ensure proper legal representation.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
1:24-cv-07290 American Civil Liberties Union Foundation et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
1:25-cv-03357 DARK MODE LLC d/b/a 404 MEDIA v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Status Report ( 14
1:25-cv-04356 The New York Times Company et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Proposed Order for Substitution of Attorney ( 26