legal-news

1:25-cr-20311-1 USA v. Fultz

25-cr-20311 Filed
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This criminal case involves the United States government prosecuting the defendant, Fultz, under docket number 25-cr-20311. The current record includes a declaration submitted in support of a non-motion filing, indicating procedural developments but no substantive rulings at this stage. Specific charges and factual background are not detailed in the available summary.

Stage

Court order issued

Timeline

11 events

Coverage

11 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Criminal prosecution
  • Procedural declaration
  • Non-motion filing
Advertisement

Case Timeline

11 events
gavel
Order April 15, 2026

1:26-cr-20117-1 USA v. Ricardo Antonio Garcia

Order on Motion to Unseal Case ( 6

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:25-cr-20161-2 USA v. Victor Waldeck Oliveira Iglesias

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 164

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:25-cr-20161-1 USA v. Victor Waldeck Oliveira Iglesias

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 164

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-20311-1 USA v. Fultz

In the case USA v. Fultz, the court received an exhibit and witness list, which outlines the evidence and witnesses that the prosecution or defense plans to present during the trial. This list helps both parties prepare for the proceedings and ensures transparency about what will be introduced as proof or testimony.

info
Verdict April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-20365-1 USA v. Rey Sandoval, et al

In the case USA v. Rey Sandoval and others, the court issued a notice or order regarding a change in plea or sentencing. This means the defendants may have altered their previous plea, such as switching from not guilty to guilty, or the court updated the sentencing details. Such changes can significantly impact the case's outcome and the defendants' legal consequences.

info
Verdict April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-20453-1 USA v. Howard Adrian Palmer

In the case of USA v. Howard Adrian Palmer, the court reached a verdict and proceeded with sentencing. This means the judge has decided the defendant's punishment based on the trial's outcome. Sentencing is crucial as it determines the consequences the defendant will face for their actions.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-20133-1 USA v. Jair Daniel Barroeta Espinoza et al

In the case of USA v. Jair Daniel Barroeta Espinoza and others, a court event was recorded under a related case number. This indicates ongoing legal proceedings involving multiple defendants, which may be connected to the case against Fultz. Understanding these linked cases is important for grasping the broader context of the investigation or prosecution.

info
Motion April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-00115-1 USA v. Cuevas

In the case USA v. Cuevas, a declaration was submitted to support a matter related to the case, though it was not a formal motion. This document provides additional information or evidence to assist the court in understanding the issues at hand. Such declarations can influence the court's decisions by clarifying facts or legal points.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:25-cr-20329-1 USA v. Skinner

A new case titled USA v. Skinner was filed under the number 1:25-cr-20329-1, separate from the existing case USA v. Fultz (1:25-cr-20311-1). This indicates that another criminal matter involving a different defendant, Skinner, is being initiated in the same court. It matters because it shows the court is handling multiple related or concurrent criminal cases.

info
Other April 13, 2026

1:26-cr-20114-1 USA v. Esho

In the case USA v. Fultz (1:25-cr-20311-1), an event categorized as 'other' occurred, which also referenced another case, USA v. Esho (1:26-cr-20114-1). Although specific details are not provided, this indicates some procedural or administrative action linking these two cases. Such events can affect how the cases proceed or are managed in court.

gavel
Order April 13, 2026

1:24-cr-20131-1 USA v. Rodriguez

The court issued an order regarding a motion to seal documents in the case USA v. Rodriguez. This means the court decided whether certain information should be kept confidential and not made public. Sealing documents can protect sensitive information or privacy interests during legal proceedings.

Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

11 articles