legal-news

4:13-cr-00291-1 USA v. Chiles

13-cr-00291 Filed
Active Motion practice Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This criminal case involves the United States government as the plaintiff against defendant Chiles. The docket reflects procedural activity including a notice of attorney appearance filed by the USA, indicating representation changes or additions. Specific charges or factual background are not detailed in the available summary.

Stage

Motion practice

Timeline

4 events

Coverage

4 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Criminal representation
  • Attorney appearance
  • Procedural status
Advertisement

Case Timeline

4 events
info
Motion April 14, 2026

4:13-cr-00291-1 USA v. Chiles

In the case USA v. Chiles, a motion was filed that is categorized as a Non-Motion, which typically means it is an administrative or procedural filing rather than a request for a court ruling. This event indicates ongoing legal activity but does not involve a substantive legal argument or decision. It matters because it shows the case is still active and procedural steps are being followed.

info
Verdict April 14, 2026

4:23-cr-00191-1 USA v. McCauley

In the case USA v. McCauley (4:23-cr-00191-1), the court reviewed the Presentence Investigation Report, which is a detailed document that helps the judge decide the appropriate sentence for the defendant. This step is crucial as it provides background information and recommendations based on the defendant's history and the nature of the offense.

info
Other April 14, 2026

4:13-cr-00097-1 USA v. Beman

In the case USA v. Beman (4:13-cr-00097-1), the government filed a notice indicating that an attorney has officially appeared on behalf of the United States. This means the court and all parties are formally informed about the attorney representing the government in this matter. Such notices ensure clear communication and proper legal representation during the proceedings.

calendar_today
Hearing April 13, 2026

3:13-cr-00591-1 USA v. Charlton

In the case of USA v. Charlton, the court held a hearing to establish or adjust deadlines and schedule future hearings. This step helps organize the case timeline and ensures that both parties know when to submit documents or appear in court. Proper scheduling is crucial for the efficient progress of the trial.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles