1:25-cr-20252-2 USA v. Rodriguez et al
Case Summary
The United States is prosecuting Rodriguez and co-defendants in a criminal matter filed under docket 25-cr-20252. The case involves multiple defendants, as indicated by the '-2' designation on the case title. The most recent docket entry — Document 176, a proof of service by publication — signals the government is attempting to reach a defendant or interested party who cannot be located through conventional means. Service by publication at this stage of a criminal case is unusual and may relate to forfeiture proceedings or an ancillary civil component. The case is well into litigation given the high document number.
Latest development
1:25-cr-00458-2 USA v. Rodriguez Medina
Motion · April 20, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Service by publication on unlocated defendant or interested party
- • Multi-defendant criminal prosecution
- • Potential forfeiture or ancillary proceedings
- • Advanced litigation stage
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Letter Motion ( 52
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
2 events1:25-cr-00458-2 USA v. Rodriguez Medina
A Motion was filed.
1:25-cr-20252-2 USA v. Rodriguez et al
The government served a defendant or party by publication in USA v. Rodriguez et al, Case No. 1:25-cr-20252-2. This happens when a party cannot be located for personal service — the government satisfies its notice obligation by publishing in an approved outlet instead. It signals at least one defendant is a fugitive or otherwise unreachable.
Press Coverage
1:25-cr-20252-2 USA v. Rodriguez et al
Service (Proof) by Publication ( 176
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.