1:24-cv-02618 Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Summary
Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al is a civil lawsuit filed under docket 24-cv-02618. The recent docket entry indicates that the summons has been returned executed, meaning the defendants have been formally served with the complaint. This procedural step allows the case to move forward toward responses or motions.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
14 events
Coverage
14 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Service of process
- • Civil litigation
- • Plaintiff claims against corporate defendants
update What Changed This Week
Case Timeline
14 events3:26-cv-03219 Sa. v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
In a federal lawsuit filed in 2024, Valdez and Sa. joined forces to sue Uber Technologies, Inc. and its affiliated entities, alleging various claims against the company. The significance of this event lies in the potential legal challenges Uber may face, as well as the impact on the company's reputation and operations in the transportation industry.
5:26-cv-02728 Sharma et al v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons was successfully delivered to the defendants in the related case Sharma et al v. Uber Technologies Inc. This means the defendants have been officially notified about the lawsuit, allowing the legal process to move forward. Proper service of summons is crucial because it ensures all parties are aware of the legal action and can respond accordingly.
3:26-cv-03210 Roe CL 306 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a proposed summons was issued related to another case, Roe CL 306 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. This means the court is formally notifying Uber about legal claims in a connected matter, which could affect how both cases proceed.
3:26-cv-00767 B.D. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, the court has officially confirmed that the summons was successfully delivered to the parties involved. This step is crucial because it ensures that the defendants are formally notified about the lawsuit, allowing the case to proceed. Without this confirmation, the case could face delays or dismissal.
3:26-cv-00765 K.K.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case K.K.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., the court confirmed that the summons was successfully delivered to the defendant. This means Uber Technologies has been officially notified about the lawsuit and must respond. Proper service of summons is crucial to ensure the legal process moves forward fairly.
3:26-cv-00761 L.R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons was officially delivered to the defendants, Uber Technologies and others. This means the defendants have been formally notified about the lawsuit and are required to respond. This step is crucial as it moves the case forward by ensuring all parties are aware and can participate in the legal process.
3:26-cv-00757 L.M.03 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons was officially delivered to the defendants in the related case L.M.03 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. This means the court has formally notified Uber and others involved about the legal action, allowing the case to proceed. Proper service of summons is a crucial step to ensure all parties are aware and can respond accordingly.
3:26-cv-00752 A.W.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons related to another case, A.W.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., was successfully served to the defendant. This means the court has officially notified Uber about the lawsuit, allowing the legal process to move forward. Proper service is crucial because it ensures that the defendant is aware of the claims against them and can respond accordingly.
3:26-cv-00749 R.T.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons was successfully delivered to the defendant, Uber Technologies. This means the court has officially notified Uber of the lawsuit, allowing the legal process to move forward. Proper service of summons is crucial to ensure the defendant is aware and can respond to the claims.
3:26-cv-00744 T.W.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons was successfully delivered to the defendants, as indicated by the 'Summons Returned Executed' status. This means the court has officially notified Uber and related parties about the lawsuit, allowing the case to proceed. Proper service of summons is crucial because it ensures all parties are aware of the legal action and can respond accordingly.
3:26-cv-00741 K.K.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons was successfully delivered in a related case, K.K.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. This means the court has officially notified the defendant about the lawsuit, allowing the legal process to move forward. Proper service of summons is crucial to ensure the defendant's right to respond.
3:26-cv-00522 L.M.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons was officially served to the defendant, Uber Technologies, Inc., in a related case L.M.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. This means the court has formally notified Uber of the legal action against them, which is a necessary step for the case to proceed. Without this, Uber would not be legally required to respond to the lawsuit.
3:26-cv-00512 N.A.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
In the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a summons was officially delivered to the defendants, confirming they have been notified of the lawsuit. This step is crucial because it ensures the defendants are aware of the legal action and must respond accordingly.
1:24-cv-02618 Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
The court issued a protective order in the case Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., which means certain information shared during the lawsuit will be kept confidential. This helps protect sensitive business or personal information from being publicly disclosed. Such orders ensure fair handling of private data during legal proceedings.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
3:26-cv-03219 Sa. v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
5:26-cv-02728 Sharma et al v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 11
3:26-cv-03210 Roe CL 306 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Proposed Summons ( 2
3:26-cv-00767 B.D. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00765 K.K.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00761 L.R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00757 L.M.03 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00752 A.W.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00749 R.T.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00744 T.W.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00741 K.K.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00522 L.M.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
3:26-cv-00512 N.A.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Summons Returned Executed ( 6
1:24-cv-02618 Valdez v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Protective Order ( 84