legal-news

1:24-cv-01105 Whitehorn v. McCann et al

updateUpdated 1 day ago
24-cv-01105 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In Whitehorn v. McCann et al, an attorney has filed to withdraw from representation. This procedural event signals a change in legal counsel, which may influence case preparation and scheduling. The substantive issues of the case are not detailed.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

5 events

Coverage

5 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Attorney withdrawal
  • Case management
  • Potential litigation delays

update What Changed This Week

5 events 5 articles
newspaper
pacer 1 day, 1 hour ago
3:24-cv-30128 Doe v. McCann et al
newspaper
pacer 1 day, 2 hours ago
1:23-cv-23217 GIST v. MCGANN et al
info
Other 1 day, 2 hours ago
3:24-cv-30128 Doe v. McCann et al
info
Other 1 day, 2 hours ago
1:23-cv-23217 GIST v. MCGANN et al
newspaper
pacer 1 day, 18 hours ago
1:20-cr-00812-3 USA v. McClain et al
Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
info
Other April 16, 2026

3:24-cv-30128 Doe v. McCann et al

In a legal case involving Whitehorn and Doe against McCann and others, a stipulation of dismissal was reached, indicating that the case has been resolved without a trial.

info
Other April 16, 2026

1:23-cv-23217 GIST v. MCGANN et al

In a legal case involving multiple parties, Whitehorn v. McCann et al and Gist v. McGann et al, a court event has taken place that may have implications for the parties involved and the broader legal landscape.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:24-cv-01105 Whitehorn v. McCann et al

In the case Whitehorn v. McCann et al, the attorney representing one of the parties has officially withdrawn from the case. This means the lawyer is no longer involved in representing their client, which could affect the client's legal strategy and case progress.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:20-cr-00812-3 USA v. McClain et al

In the case Whitehorn v. McCann et al, an event related to a different case, USA v. McClain et al, was noted. This cross-reference may indicate overlapping issues or parties between the civil and criminal cases, which could affect proceedings or outcomes in both matters.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:20-cr-00812-4 USA v. McClain et al

In the case Whitehorn v. McCann et al, a related criminal case titled USA v. McClain et al is referenced, indicating a connection between the civil and criminal proceedings. This linkage may influence the civil case's outcome by providing relevant context or evidence from the criminal matter. Understanding this relationship helps clarify the broader legal issues at play.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

5 articles