newspaper
legal-news
1:24-cr-00362-2 USA v. GOGLIORMELLA
24-cr-00362
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
In this criminal case, the United States is prosecuting Gogliormella. The docket references an endorsed letter, which may relate to procedural or evidentiary matters. No further substantive information about charges or proceedings is available.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Criminal prosecution
- • Procedural correspondence
- • Government as plaintiff
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
3 events
groups
Hearing
3 days ago
A hearing was held in the case USA v. Vazquez-Pons et al to set or reset future court dates. This procedural step is important to organize the timeline for the trial and ensure all parties are prepared. It helps keep the case moving forward
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
~Util - Set/Reset Hearings
Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order
3 days ago
The court issued an order to continue the case USA v. Jacques-Scott, meaning the trial or hearing has been postponed. This delay is considered to be in the interest of justice, allowing more time for preparation or other necessary actions.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order to Continue - Interest of Justice ( 29
Open original open_in_new
edit_note
Motion
5 days ago
In the case of USA v. Gogliormella, a letter motion was filed, which is a formal request submitted to the court asking for a specific ruling or action. This motion could influence how the case proceeds or affect decisions on key issues. Und
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Letter Motion ( 93
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
5 events
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:24-cr-00362-3 USA v. GOGLIORMELLA
In the case USA v. Gogliormella, a new related case numbered 1:24-cr-00362-3 was filed alongside the existing case 1:24-cr-00362-2. This indicates that additional charges or defendants connected to the original case are being addressed. It matters because it expands the scope of the legal proceedings and may impact the overall outcome.
groups
Hearing
April 15, 2026
1:24-cr-20362-2 USA v. Vazquez-Pons et al
A hearing was held in the case USA v. Vazquez-Pons et al to set or reset future court dates. This procedural step is important to organize the timeline for the trial and ensure all parties are prepared. It helps keep the case moving forward efficiently.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:25-cr-00356-2 USA v. Jacques-Scott
The court issued an order to continue the case USA v. Jacques-Scott, meaning the trial or hearing has been postponed. This delay is considered to be in the interest of justice, allowing more time for preparation or other necessary actions. Such continuances help ensure a fair legal process for all parties involved.
info
Other
April 14, 2026
1:23-cr-00622-2 USA v. CASTILLERO
In the case USA v. GOGLIORMELLA, the court recorded an endorsed letter related to a separate but connected case, USA v. CASTILLERO. This indicates ongoing communication or coordination between these cases, which may impact proceedings or decisions in both matters.
edit_note
Motion
April 13, 2026
1:24-cr-00362-2 USA v. GOGLIORMELLA
In the case of USA v. Gogliormella, a letter motion was filed, which is a formal request submitted to the court asking for a specific ruling or action. This motion could influence how the case proceeds or affect decisions on key issues. Understanding the content and purpose of the motion is important for anticipating the next steps in the trial.
Advertisement
newspaper
5 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:25-cr-00356-2 USA v. Jacques-Scott
Order to Continue - Interest of Justice ( 29
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
newspaper
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.