legal-news

1:20-cr-00481-2 USA v. SANTOS

20-cr-00481
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

USA v. Santos is a criminal case involving the United States government as the prosecution. The docket activity indicates scheduling or resetting of hearings, reflecting ongoing pretrial or trial procedural management.

Latest development

1:24-cr-00431-2 USA v. KOTLER

Order · April 15, 2026

In the case USA v. Kotler, the court issued a consent order, which means both parties agreed to the terms set by the court without further dispute. This type of order helps resolve the case efficiently and avoids prolonged litigation. It matters because it reflects a mutual agreement that can expedite the legal process.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • Criminal prosecution
  • • Hearing scheduling
  • • Pretrial procedure
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

2 events
gavel
Order 3 days ago
In the case USA v. Kotler, the court issued a consent order, which means both parties agreed to the terms set by the court without further dispute. This type of order helps resolve the case efficiently and avoids prolonged litigation. It ma
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Consent Order ( 50

Open original open_in_new
groups
Hearing 3 days ago
A hearing was held in the case USA v. Santos to schedule or reschedule upcoming court dates. This step is important to ensure the case proceeds in an orderly and timely manner. Setting or resetting hearings helps manage the court's docket a
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

~Util - Set/Reset Hearings ( 283

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 15, 2026

1:24-cr-00411-2 USA v. Merritt et al

In the case USA v. Merritt et al, a defendant was terminated from the proceedings, meaning they are no longer part of the case. This could be due to dismissal, plea agreement, or other legal reasons. It matters because the case now proceeds without this individual, potentially affecting the overall strategy and outcome.

description View filing open_in_new
gavel
Order April 15, 2026

1:24-cr-00431-2 USA v. KOTLER

In the case USA v. Kotler, the court issued a consent order, which means both parties agreed to the terms set by the court without further dispute. This type of order helps resolve the case efficiently and avoids prolonged litigation. It matters because it reflects a mutual agreement that can expedite the legal process.

description View filing open_in_new
groups
Hearing April 15, 2026

1:20-cr-00481-2 USA v. SANTOS

A hearing was held in the case USA v. Santos to schedule or reschedule upcoming court dates. This step is important to ensure the case proceeds in an orderly and timely manner. Setting or resetting hearings helps manage the court's docket and keeps all parties informed of the timeline.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

3 days, 16 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.