1:19-cr-00419-1 USA v. FLORES et al
Case Summary
The United States brought a criminal case against Flores and others under docket 19-cr-00419. The case is in the scheduling phase, indicating ongoing pretrial management but no substantive details about charges or allegations are provided.
Latest development
1:19-cr-00419-1 USA v. EDWARDS
Hearing · April 15, 2026
In the case USA v. Edwards, a hearing was held to set or reschedule important court dates. This step is crucial to ensure the trial proceeds smoothly and all parties have adequate time to prepare. It helps maintain the court's schedule and the defendant's right to a timely trial.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Criminal prosecution
- • Pretrial scheduling
- • Defendant rights
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Set/Reset Hearings
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Scheduling Order ( 190
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
5 events1:19-cr-00419-1 USA v. EDWARDS
In the case USA v. Edwards, a hearing was held to set or reschedule important court dates. This step is crucial to ensure the trial proceeds smoothly and all parties have adequate time to prepare. It helps maintain the court's schedule and the defendant's right to a timely trial.
1:19-cr-00719-1 USA v. GILLIAM
In the case USA v. Flores, an event was recorded referencing another case, USA v. Gilliam, but no specific details were provided about the event itself. This indicates a possible connection or related matter between the two cases. Understanding this link could be important for the overall legal proceedings.
1:19-cr-00950-1 USA v. TOOMBS
In the case USA v. Flores and the related case USA v. Toombs, a court event labeled as 'other' took place, indicating a procedural or administrative action rather than a trial or hearing. Although specific details are not provided, such events often involve scheduling, filings, or other court management activities. These steps are essential to keep the legal process moving forward efficiently.
1:21-cr-00415-1 USA v. SOLANO
In the case USA v. SOLANO, a memorandum was submitted to the court's docket clerk. This document likely contains important information or instructions related to the case proceedings. Such filings help ensure the court's records are up to date and facilitate the smooth management of the case.
1:19-cr-00419-1 USA v. FLORES et al
The court issued a scheduling order in the case USA v. Flores et al, which sets important deadlines and timelines for how the case will proceed. This helps organize the process and ensures that both sides know when to submit documents and prepare for hearings. Scheduling orders are crucial for keeping the case on track and avoiding unnecessary delays.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 18 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.