legal-news

PT Legon Pari et al v. GA Telesis, LLC et al

26-cv-60110
Active Hearing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In this civil case, PT Legon Pari and others are plaintiffs against GA Telesis, LLC and others. Recent docket entries relate to scheduling motions, reports and recommendations, and setting/resetting deadlines and hearings. This indicates active case management but no substantive rulings reported.

Latest development

0:26-cv-60110 PT Legon Pari et al v. GA Telesis, LLC et al

Hearing · April 14, 2026

The court held a hearing to establish or adjust deadlines and schedules for motions and recommendations related to the case Legon Pari et al v. GA Telesis, LLC et al. This helps organize the timeline for filing and responding to legal motions, ensuring the case proceeds efficiently. Setting these deadlines is crucial for managing the court's docket and the parties' preparations.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Motion deadlines
  • Pretrial procedures
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
groups
Hearing April 14, 2026

0:26-cv-60110 PT Legon Pari et al v. GA Telesis, LLC et al

The court held a hearing to establish or adjust deadlines and schedules for motions and recommendations related to the case Legon Pari et al v. GA Telesis, LLC et al. This helps organize the timeline for filing and responding to legal motions, ensuring the case proceeds efficiently. Setting these deadlines is crucial for managing the court's docket and the parties' preparations.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 21 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.