legal-news

Zurich American Insurance Company et al v. Peck & Hiller Company

26-cv-02807
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Zurich American Insurance Company and co-plaintiffs filed suit against Peck & Hiller Company in case 26-cv-02807. The docket reflects a clerk's notice on magistrate judge consent or declination, placing this at the threshold of active litigation. Insurance company suits against contractors or service firms in this posture typically involve subrogation — the insurer paid a loss and now sues the party it holds responsible. Peck & Hiller is a mechanical and plumbing contractor, which fits a subrogation theory tied to property damage from a system failure or construction defect.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Insurance subrogation claim against Peck & Hiller
  • • Underlying property damage or casualty event
  • • Contractor liability for alleged defective work or equipment failure
  • • Damages amount and coverage scope
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 20, 2026

3:26-cv-02807 Zurich American Insurance Company et al v. Peck & Hiller Company

The clerk issued a notice asking the parties whether they consent to have a magistrate judge handle the case instead of a district judge. Both sides must respond, and if either party declines, the case stays with the district judge — no explanation required.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 hours, 14 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.