1:25-cv-10378 Zenon v. Propelle + Konnect et al
Pre-Motion Conference
Civil case in S.D.N.Y. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:25-cv-10378 Zenon v. Propelle + Konnect et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
Latest development
Motion · April 30, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-10378 Zenon v. Propelle + Konnect et al
Motion · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Propelle + Konnect and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Zenon v. Propelle + Konnect et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-10378.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Propelle + Konnect. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest motion produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
A Motion was filed.
Pre-Motion Conference
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
8 hours, 42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.