legal-news

Yvonne Clerc v. Douglas A Collins

24-cv-06772 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case of Yvonne Clerc v. Douglas A Collins was dismissed. This means the court has officially ended the lawsuit. The case number is 2:24-cv-06772.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • dismissal
  • Yvonne Clerc
  • Douglas A Collins
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:24-cv-06772 Yvonne Clerc v. Douglas A Collins

Other · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Douglas A Collins, 2:24-cv-06772 Yvonne Clerc.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 29, 2026

2:24-cv-06772 Yvonne Clerc v. Douglas A Collins

The case of Yvonne Clerc v. Douglas A Collins was dismissed. This means the court has officially ended the lawsuit. The case number is 2:24-cv-06772.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 6 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.