Central District of California Sends Supplemental Appeal Record in Lopez v. Elkabany
Case Summary
In Yesenia Lopez et al v. Ali Elkabany et al, the Central District of California court sent a supplemental record of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals. This procedural step indicates ongoing appellate review of the district court's prior rulings.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Appeal process
- • Record on appeal
- • Appellate jurisdiction
- • Procedural compliance
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:25-cv-02406 Yesenia Lopez et al v. Ali Elkabany et al
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ali Elkabany, Department of Education, Yesenia Lopez.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events5:25-cv-02406 Yesenia Lopez et al v. Ali Elkabany et al
The court issued a text-only scheduling notice in the case Yesenia Lopez et al v. Ali Elkabany et al, docket number 5:25-cv-02406. This notice likely sets or updates important dates for case proceedings. It matters because scheduling notices dictate the timeline for filings and hearings, affecting how the case moves forward.
1:25-cv-02406 LONG v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
The court sent a supplemental record on appeal (ROA) to the United States Court of Appeals in the case Yesenia Lopez et al v. Ali Elkabany et al. This means additional documents or evidence from the trial court are now part of the appellate record. It matters because the appeals court will review these materials when deciding the case.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.