4:23-cv-01812 Yates v. Sonoma County et al
Request for Judicial Notice ( 61
The plaintiff in Yates v. Sonoma County et al has requested that the court take judicial notice of certain facts, which is a formal request to the court to acknowledge and consider these facts as true. This request is likely related to the ongoing case, which involves the plaintiff's claims against Sonoma County and other defendants. The request for judicial notice may be an attempt to introduce new evidence or to clarify existing facts in the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
4:23-cv-01812 Yates v. Sonoma County et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Sonoma County and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The plaintiff in Yates v. Sonoma County et al has requested that the court take judicial notice of certain facts, which is a formal request to the court to acknowledge and consider these facts as true. This request is likely related to the ongoing case, which involves the plaintiff's claims against Sonoma County and other defendants. The request for judicial notice may be an attempt to introduce new evidence or to clarify existing facts in the case.
Request for Judicial Notice ( 61
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 7 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.