legal-news

XPEL Seeks Clerk's Default Against Dope Tintings in Federal Court

24-cv-07684
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

XPEL has asked the clerk of the federal court to enter default against Dope Tintings under docket 24-cv-07684. A clerk's entry of default is the procedural step that follows a defendant's failure to appear or respond within the required time, and it sets the stage for a default judgment motion. XPEL, a manufacturer of paint protection film and window tint products, has pursued similar enforcement actions against alleged infringers and unauthorized installers in the past. The nature of the underlying claims — whether trademark, contract, or otherwise — is not specified in the available filing.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Defendant Dope Tintings' failure to respond or appear
  • • Grounds for XPEL's underlying claims
  • • Likelihood of default judgment and damages award
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 20, 2026

1:24-cv-07684 XPEL, INC. v. DOPE TINTINGS LLC

XPEL filed a request for clerk's entry of default against Dope Tintings LLC in case 1:24-cv-07684. This means Dope Tintings failed to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint within the required time. XPEL is now asking the clerk to formally record that failure — the first step toward a default judgment.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 hours, 34 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.