civil-litigation intellectual-property federal-courts court-watch

Wood v. Curious Elixirs LLC: Summons Request Filed

26-cv-04660 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Wood has filed a summons request in a civil case against Curious Elixirs LLC in the Central District of California. This action typically follows the filing of a complaint, initiating the formal service of process on the defendant.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Summons request
  • Service of process
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cv-04660 Guardado v. Blue Massage et al

Other · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

3 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Curious Elixirs LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Blue Massage and others.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 3 hours ago

Wood v. Curious Elixirs LLC is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-04660.

The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-04660 Guardado and 3:26-cv-04660 THORNTON on one side and Blue Massage, Curious Elixirs LLC, and JOHNSON & JOHNSON on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Intellectual-property ownership and infringement, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued. On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to consolidate the Wood v. Curious Elixirs LLC case with the 3:26-cv-04660 case, which involves Johnson & Johnson.

This means that the two cases will be heard together, potentially streamlining the legal process. The consolidation. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case of Wood v. Curious Elixirs LLC, citing the need to protect confidential business information. This decision allows the company to keep sensitive information private. The ruling has implications for.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

2:26-cv-04660 Guardado v. Blue Massage et al

A Summons was issued.

info
Other April 28, 2026

3:26-cv-04660 THORNTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al

The court granted a motion to consolidate the Wood v. Curious Elixirs LLC case with the 3:26-cv-04660 case, which involves Johnson & Johnson. This means that the two cases will be heard together, potentially streamlining the legal process. The consolidation may also impact the outcome of the cases.

info
Other April 24, 2026

1:26-cv-04660 Wood v. Curious Elixirs LLC

The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case of Wood v. Curious Elixirs LLC, citing the need to protect confidential business information. This decision allows the company to keep sensitive information private. The ruling has implications for future cases involving trade secrets and confidentiality.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

10 hours, 53 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.