Williams v. Santa Rosa Medical Hospital et al

description

Case Summary

The court certified that the parties discussed alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, as required by local rule 3-5(b). This certification is a procedural step in the case, indicating that the parties have considered ADR as a potential path forward. The certification does not indicate a resolution to the case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other April 21, 2026

3:25-cv-06118 Williams v. Santa Rosa Medical Hospital et al

The court certified that the parties discussed alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, as required by local rule 3-5(b). This certification is a procedural step in the case, indicating that the parties have considered ADR as a potential path forward. The certification does not indicate a resolution to the case.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article

All No paywall (1) Original reporting (1)

newspaper

Coverage

3:25-cv-06118 Williams v. Santa Rosa Medical Hospital et al

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options ( 25

Apr 21, 2026 · 1 min read