legal-news

WILLIAMS v. PERCARIO, NITTI, & STRUBEN LLC et al

25-cv-18079
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court has identified a deficiency in the defendant's answer to the complaint, specifically in the form of an ADS (ad damnum clause) deficiency. This means that the defendant's response to the lawsuit is incomplete or improperly formatted. The court will require the defendant to correct this deficiency.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 21, 2026

2:25-cv-18079 WILLIAMS v. PERCARIO, NITTI, & STRUBEN LLC et al

The court has identified a deficiency in the defendant's answer to the complaint, specifically in the form of an ADS (ad damnum clause) deficiency. This means that the defendant's response to the lawsuit is incomplete or improperly formatted. The court will require the defendant to correct this deficiency.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

7 hours, 29 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.