2:25-cv-16720 Walgreen Co. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd. et al
Amended Complaint ( 53
Walgreen Co. and others filed an amended complaint against Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd. for patent infringement in case 25-cv-16720. The court is not identified.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-16720 Walgreen Co. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd. et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd, Walgreen Co.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Walgreen Co. Sues Teva Pharmaceuticals Over Patent Infringement is an active civil matter under docket 25-cv-16720.
The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-16720 Walgreen Co on one side and Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd on the other. The case is currently organized around Amended Complaint, Unknown Court.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: An Amended Complaint was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
An Amended Complaint was filed.
Amended Complaint ( 53
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.