2:25-cv-09648 Volodymyr Diakov v. Kika Scott et al
Status Report ( 16
Volodymyr Diakov filed a status report in a case against Kika Scott and others in the Central District of California. The report informs the court of developments and pending issues. Status reports assist the court in managing case timelines.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-09648 Volodymyr Diakov v. Kika Scott et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Volodymyr Diakov and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Volodymyr Diakov v. Kika Scott et al: Status Report Filed is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-09648.
The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 2:25-cv-09648 Volodymyr Diakov. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The parties filed a joint status report.
Status Report ( 16
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 13 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.