Villegas-Godoy v. Baltazar et al

Villegas-Godoy v. Baltazar et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-01842.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-03260 Artola Arauz, 1:26-cv-01842 Maldonado, and 1:26-cv-01842 Villegas-Godoy on one side and Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Los Angeles Community College District on the other.

The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, School, university, and education-policy disputes, Discovery obligations and evidence access, Agency action and administrative review.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The Los Angeles Community College District has been granted an extension to respond to the complaint in Breahna Green v. Los Angeles Community College District, case number 2:26-cv-01842. This means they now have 30 days or less to file their answer.

The. On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to consolidate the case of Artola Arauz v. Baltazar et al with Villegas-Godoy v. Baltazar et al, allowing the two cases to be heard together. This consolidation will likely streamline the proceedings and reduce costs for the parties. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has received the SSA Administrative Record in the case of Maldonado v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, which is a separate case from Villegas-Godoy v. Baltazar et al. This record is likely being shared as part of the discovery.

On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Villegas-Godoy v. Baltazar case, citing concerns for the safety of the plaintiff. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential.

The sealed documents will remain under.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.