Villalona v. Warden, Oakdale FCI 1 Miscellaneous Relief Filed
Case Summary
The court has scheduled a hearing for Villalona v. Warden, Oakdale FCI 1 Miscellaneous Relief Filed. This hearing is related to case 3:26-cr-05094-1 USA vs Villalona. The exact nature of the hearing is not specified.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:26-cr-05094-1 USA vs Villalona
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Warden, Oakdale FCI 1, 0:22-cv-60503 Villalona and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
Case Timeline
2 events3:26-cr-05094-1 USA vs Villalona
The court has scheduled a hearing for Villalona v. Warden, Oakdale FCI 1 Miscellaneous Relief Filed. This hearing is related to case 3:26-cr-05094-1 USA vs Villalona. The exact nature of the hearing is not specified.
0:22-cv-60503 Villalona v. Warden, Oakdale FCI 1
The court granted miscellaneous relief to Villalona in the case of Villalona v. Warden, Oakdale FCI 1 (0:22-cv-60503). This means the court has taken action outside of the main lawsuit to address a specific issue. The exact nature of the relief is not specified.
Press Coverage
0:22-cv-60503 Villalona v. Warden, Oakdale FCI 1
Miscellaneous Relief ( 36
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
19 hours, 35 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.