5:26-cv-02321 Jairo Enrique Saenz Camelo v. D. Marin et al
Appointment of Counsel ( 2
This case involves a stipulation without a proposed order filed by the parties in a civil matter. The stipulation is a non-binding agreement between the parties and is a routine procedural step in the case. The parties have agreed to the stipulation, but it has not been approved by the court.
Latest development
Order · April 22, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-02321 Marquise Bailey v. Rafael Ramos et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
7 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Westlake Services, LLC d/b/a Westlake Financial, Rafael Ramos, Jairo Enrique Saenz Camelo and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Ventura v. Westlake Services, LLC d/b/a Westlake Financial is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-02321.
The dispute currently identifies 5:26-cv-02321 Jairo Enrique Saenz Camelo on one side and Westlake Services, LLC d/b/a Westlake Financial on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Contract interpretation and performance obligations, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
This case involves a stipulation without a proposed order filed by the parties in a civil matter. The stipulation is a non-binding agreement between the parties and is a routine procedural step in the case. The parties have agreed to the stipulation, but it has not been approved by the court.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court appointed counsel for Jairo Enrique Saenz Camelo in the case of 5:26-cv-02321. This appointment is a procedural step in the case. It allows the court to ensure that the plaintiff has representation.
On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The parties reported a settlement.
A Summons was issued.
The court appointed counsel for Jairo Enrique Saenz Camelo in the case of 5:26-cv-02321. This appointment is a procedural step in the case. It allows the court to ensure that the plaintiff has representation.
The court issued an order.
Appointment of Counsel ( 2
Stipulation without Proposed Order ( 10
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 13 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.