civil-litigation government-litigation federal-courts

Stay lifted in Vanderpool v. City of New York in Southern District of New York

25-cv-06905 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court lifted the stay in the case of Wellington v. The City of New York, allowing the case to proceed. This means that the parties can now move forward with the litigation. The stay was previously in place, halting the case's progress.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:24-cv-08743 Wellington v. The City of New York

Other · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes City Of New York, City of New York, 1:25-cv-06905 Vanderpool and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 9 hours ago

Vanderpool v. City Of New York is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-06905.

The dispute currently identifies 1:24-cv-08743 Wellington and 1:25-cv-06905 Vanderpool on one side and City Of New York and City of New York on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, government litigation, federal courts.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court lifted the stay in the case of Wellington v. The City of New York, allowing the case to proceed. This means that the parties can now move forward with the litigation.

The stay was previously in place, halting the case's progress. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the City of New York in the Vanderpool v. City of New York case, allowing them to file a response.

This extension was likely granted due to unforeseen circumstances or a need for additional time to prepare a.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

1:24-cv-08743 Wellington v. The City of New York

The court lifted the stay in the case of Wellington v. The City of New York, allowing the case to proceed. This means that the parties can now move forward with the litigation. The stay was previously in place, halting the case's progress.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:25-cv-06905 Vanderpool v. City Of New York

The court granted an extension of time for the City of New York in the Vanderpool v. City of New York case, allowing them to file a response. This extension was likely granted due to unforeseen circumstances or a need for additional time to prepare a response. The extension of time is a common request in civil cases.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 hours, 20 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.