civil-litigation federal-courts

Vance v. Amazon.Com Services, LLC.

24-cv-01111 N.D. Ill.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Civil case in N.D. Ill. currently marked active. Latest development: 5:22-cv-01987 Edward McKenzie v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Ill.

Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

5:22-cv-01987 Edward McKenzie v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, Amazon.com Services LLC, 5:22-cv-01987 Edward McKenzie and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 12, 2026

5:22-cv-01987 Edward McKenzie v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al

The parties filed a joint status report.

info
Other May 12, 2026

1:24-cv-01111 Vance v. Amazon.Com Services, LLC.

The court entered judgment.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

51 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.