USA files criminal charges against Pulido-Naranjo in Western District of Washington
Case Summary
The United States filed criminal charges against Pulido-Naranjo in the Western District of Washington under docket 25-cr-05010. Rule 5 documents have been received, signaling initial proceedings such as arraignment or detention hearings. The case likely involves federal criminal allegations.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Federal criminal charges
- • Rule 5 proceedings
- • Initial court appearances
- • Defendant rights
Docket Snapshot
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cr-05010-1 USA vs Pulido-Naranjo
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Pulido-Naranjo.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
Case Timeline
1 event3:25-cr-05010-1 USA vs Pulido-Naranjo
The court received Rule 5 documents in the criminal case USA vs Pulido-Naranjo, docket number 3:25-cr-05010-1. This means the government has formally transferred the case from the initial arrest jurisdiction to the prosecuting district. Receiving these documents triggers the next procedural steps in the federal prosecution.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 33 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.