newspaper
legal-news
USA v. Torres et al
18-cr-20507
N.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court issued a notice in the case of Tanner v. Torres et al, which is related to the case USA v. Torres et al. This notice is a procedural step in the case, but its specific content is not provided. The notice is likely related to a pending motion or other court action.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-11080 Tanner v. Torres et al
Other · May 05, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
3 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 4, 2026
3:25-cv-11080 Tanner v. Torres et al
The court issued a notice in the case of Tanner v. Torres et al, which is related to the case USA v. Torres et al. This notice is a procedural step in the case, but its specific content is not provided. The notice is likely related to a pending motion or other court action.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
1:18-cr-20507-1 USA v. Torres et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. Torres et al case, allowing the prosecution to use the seized materials as evidence. This decision is significant because it allows the prosecution to proceed with their case against the defendants. The motion was denied due to the lack of sufficient evidence to support the claim that the search was unlawful.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
23 hours, 50 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.