Surani et al Face Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
Case Summary
Surani et al have been granted an extension of time to file a response/reply in the 25-cr-00037 docket. The court has ordered the extension, which will allow the parties to prepare and submit their responses. The case is currently pending in the 25-cr-00037 docket. The extension is necessary to ensure a fair and just outcome.
Stage
Verdict entered
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
3
Key Issues
- • Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Criminal charges and procedural posture
- • Sentencing exposure and post-conviction consequences
- • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Verdict entered
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
8:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. Ballardo-Garcia
Verdict · May 04, 2026
Coverage
5 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
9 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a verdict dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ballardo-Garcia and others.
Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Surani et al Face Extension of Time to File Response/Reply is an active criminal matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cr-00037.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Ballardo-Garcia. The case is currently organized around Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Criminal charges and procedural posture, Sentencing exposure and post-conviction consequences.
Surani et al have been granted an extension of time to file a response/reply in the 25-cr-00037 docket. The court has ordered the extension, which will allow the parties to prepare and submit their responses. The case is currently pending in the 25-cr-00037 docket.
The extension is necessary to ensure a fair and just outcome.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a verdict: The court granted an extension of time for Surani et al to file a response/reply in the case USA v. Ballardo-Garcia (8:25-cr-00037-1). This decision allows Surani et al more time to prepare their response.
The extension is significant because it gives Surani. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Surani et al an extension of time to file their response/reply in the case USA v. FREEMAN (2:25-cr-00037-1). This means they now have more time to prepare and submit their response. The extension is significant because it gives the.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a verdict: The court granted an extension of time for Surani et al to file a response or reply in the case USA v. Clayton et al (1:25-cr-00037-3). This extension is related to the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) filed on 143.
The extension will allow Surani et al.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest verdict produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
5 events8:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. Ballardo-Garcia
The court granted an extension of time for Surani et al to file a response/reply in the case USA v. Ballardo-Garcia (8:25-cr-00037-1). This decision allows Surani et al more time to prepare their response. The extension is significant because it gives Surani et al a chance to fully address the issues raised in the case.
1:25-cr-00037-4 USA v. Clayton et al
A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.
2:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. FREEMAN
The court granted Surani et al an extension of time to file their response/reply in the case USA v. FREEMAN (2:25-cr-00037-1). This means they now have more time to prepare and submit their response. The extension is significant because it gives the defendants more time to review the case and prepare their defense.
1:25-cr-00037-3 USA v. Clayton et al
The court granted an extension of time for Surani et al to file a response or reply in the case USA v. Clayton et al (1:25-cr-00037-3). This extension is related to the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) filed on 143. The extension will allow Surani et al to review and respond to the PSR.
4:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. Surani et al
A Motion was filed.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
1:25-cr-00037-4 USA v. Clayton et al
Notice of Attorney Appearance - Defendant ( 145
1:25-cr-00037-3 USA v. Clayton et al
Presentence Investigation Report ( 143
4:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. Surani et al
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 47
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
4 days, 13 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.