criminal-case criminal-law sentencing federal-courts court-watch

Surani et al Face Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

25-cr-00037 C.D. Cal.
Active Verdict entered Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Surani et al have been granted an extension of time to file a response/reply in the 25-cr-00037 docket. The court has ordered the extension, which will allow the parties to prepare and submit their responses. The case is currently pending in the 25-cr-00037 docket. The extension is necessary to ensure a fair and just outcome.

Stage

Verdict entered

Timeline

5 events

Coverage

5 articles

Sources

3

Key Issues

  • Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Criminal charges and procedural posture
  • Sentencing exposure and post-conviction consequences
  • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Verdict entered

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

8:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. Ballardo-Garcia

Verdict · May 04, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

5 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

9 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a verdict dated May 04, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ballardo-Garcia and others.

Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 13 hours ago

Surani et al Face Extension of Time to File Response/Reply is an active criminal matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cr-00037.

The main identified defendant or respondent is Ballardo-Garcia. The case is currently organized around Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Criminal charges and procedural posture, Sentencing exposure and post-conviction consequences.

Surani et al have been granted an extension of time to file a response/reply in the 25-cr-00037 docket. The court has ordered the extension, which will allow the parties to prepare and submit their responses. The case is currently pending in the 25-cr-00037 docket.

The extension is necessary to ensure a fair and just outcome.

On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a verdict: The court granted an extension of time for Surani et al to file a response/reply in the case USA v. Ballardo-Garcia (8:25-cr-00037-1). This decision allows Surani et al more time to prepare their response.

The extension is significant because it gives Surani. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Surani et al an extension of time to file their response/reply in the case USA v. FREEMAN (2:25-cr-00037-1). This means they now have more time to prepare and submit their response. The extension is significant because it gives the.

On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a verdict: The court granted an extension of time for Surani et al to file a response or reply in the case USA v. Clayton et al (1:25-cr-00037-3). This extension is related to the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) filed on 143.

The extension will allow Surani et al.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest verdict produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
verified
Verdict May 4, 2026

8:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. Ballardo-Garcia

The court granted an extension of time for Surani et al to file a response/reply in the case USA v. Ballardo-Garcia (8:25-cr-00037-1). This decision allows Surani et al more time to prepare their response. The extension is significant because it gives Surani et al a chance to fully address the issues raised in the case.

info
Other May 1, 2026

1:25-cr-00037-4 USA v. Clayton et al

A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.

info
Other April 30, 2026

2:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. FREEMAN

The court granted Surani et al an extension of time to file their response/reply in the case USA v. FREEMAN (2:25-cr-00037-1). This means they now have more time to prepare and submit their response. The extension is significant because it gives the defendants more time to review the case and prepare their defense.

verified
Verdict April 29, 2026

1:25-cr-00037-3 USA v. Clayton et al

The court granted an extension of time for Surani et al to file a response or reply in the case USA v. Clayton et al (1:25-cr-00037-3). This extension is related to the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) filed on 143. The extension will allow Surani et al to review and respond to the PSR.

gavel
Order April 23, 2026

4:25-cr-00037-1 USA v. Surani et al

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

5 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 5 articles

Timeline events

5 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 13 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.