legal-news

USA v. Santana: Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel

14-cr-00382 D.N.J.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

An order has been entered in the case of USA v. Santana, regarding a motion to appoint counsel. The court has not been specified. The docket number for this case is 14-cr-00382.

Latest development

1:14-cr-00382-2 USA v. SANTANA

Order · April 29, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel
  • Unknown Court
  • Docket Number 14-cr-00382
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:14-cr-00382-2 USA v. SANTANA

Order · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 29, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 29, 2026

1:14-cr-00382-2 USA v. SANTANA

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

22 hours, 6 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.