legal-news

USA v. ROSEBAR: Request for Leave to File Review Filed

16-cr-00018 D.D.C.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court granted the defendant's request to file a review in the case USA v. ROSEBAR (1:16-cr-00018-1). This means the defendant can now submit additional information to the court for review. The request was granted without opposition.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.D.C.

District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:16-cr-00018-1 USA v. ROSEBAR

Other · May 07, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 7, 2026

1:16-cr-00018-1 USA v. ROSEBAR

The court granted the defendant's request to file a review in the case USA v. ROSEBAR (1:16-cr-00018-1). This means the defendant can now submit additional information to the court for review. The request was granted without opposition.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 30 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.