criminal-case criminal-law federal-courts

Detention Request Filed in USA v. Pulido-Naranjo in Central District of California

26-mj-02657 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The Central District of California received a detention request in USA v. Pulido-Naranjo, docket 26-mj-02657. The request seeks to hold the defendant in custody pending further proceedings.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Pretrial detention
  • Bail determination
  • Flight risk
  • Danger to community
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-mj-02657-1 USA v. Pulido-Naranjo

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Pulido-Naranjo.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 12, 2026

2:26-mj-02657-1 USA v. Pulido-Naranjo

The court received a request to detain the defendant, Pulido-Naranjo, in case number 2:26-mj-02657-1. This means the government is asking the judge to hold the defendant in custody pending further proceedings. Detention requests affect the defendant's liberty before trial and can influence case strategy.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

15 hours, 1 minute ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.