criminal-case criminal-law federal-courts

USA v. Pen Register

26-mj-01782 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court extended the authorization for the government to use a pen register and trap and trace device in the case USA v. Pen Register, docket number 1:26-mj-00733-1. This means law enforcement can continue collecting dialing, routing, and signaling information for a longer period. The extension allows the investigation to proceed without interruption.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-mj-00733-1 USA v. Pen Register

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Pen Register and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
info
Other May 11, 2026

1:26-mj-00733-1 USA v. Pen Register

The court extended the authorization for the government to use a pen register and trap and trace device in the case USA v. Pen Register, docket number 1:26-mj-00733-1. This means law enforcement can continue collecting dialing, routing, and signaling information for a longer period. The extension allows the investigation to proceed without interruption.

info
Other May 11, 2026

1:26-mj-01784-1 USA v. Pen Register

The court approved the government's request to use a pen register and trap and trace device in the case USA v. Pen Register, docket number 1:26-mj-01784-1. This allows law enforcement to record phone numbers dialed and incoming calls without capturing the content of the conversations. The approval signals the investigation is moving forward with electronic surveillance tools.

info
Other May 11, 2026

1:26-mj-00817-1 USA v. Pen Register

The court granted an extension for the use of a pen register and trap and trace device in the case USA v. Pen Register, docket number 1:26-mj-00817-1. This means law enforcement can continue collecting dialing, routing, addressing, or signaling information beyond the original authorized period. The extension allows the investigation to proceed without interruption.

info
Other May 11, 2026

1:26-mj-01783-1 USA v. Pen Register

The court granted the government's application for a pen register and trap and trace order in case number 1:26-mj-01783-1, USA v. Pen Register. This allows law enforcement to record dialing, routing, and signaling information from phone calls without capturing the content. The order supports the investigation by providing metadata that can identify communication patterns.

info
Other May 11, 2026

1:26-mj-01782-1 USA v. Pen Register

The court granted the government's application for a pen register and trap and trace device in case number 1:26-mj-01782-1, USA v. Pen Register. This allows law enforcement to collect dialing, routing, and signaling information from the target's phone without capturing the content of communications. The order supports ongoing surveillance efforts in the investigation.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

5 records on file

Last updated

1 hour, 6 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.