newspaper
legal-news
USA v. PARMAR et al
18-cr-00735
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court granted a motion to intervene in the case USA v. PARMAR et al, allowing Wu to join the lawsuit as a party. This move gives Wu a seat at the table and allows them to participate in the case. The intervention is significant because it expands the scope of the lawsuit and may impact the outcome.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
5 events
info
Other
April 27, 2026
1:26-cv-22060 Wu v. Parra et al
The court granted a motion to intervene in the case USA v. PARMAR et al, allowing Wu to join the lawsuit as a party. This move gives Wu a seat at the table and allows them to participate in the case. The intervention is significant because it expands the scope of the lawsuit and may impact the outcome.
info
Other
April 27, 2026
2:18-cr-00735-3 USA v. PARMAR et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. PARMAR et al case, allowing the prosecution to use the seized items against the defendants. This decision is significant because it means the prosecution can continue to use the evidence they collected during the investigation. The defendants will now have to face the charges with the potentially incriminating evidence against them.
info
Other
April 27, 2026
2:18-cr-00735-1 USA v. PARMAR et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. PARMAR et al case, allowing the prosecution to use the evidence against the defendants. This decision is significant because it means the prosecution can continue to build its case against the defendants. The motion was likely filed to challenge the legality of the evidence collection.
info
Other
April 27, 2026
2:18-cr-00735-2 USA v. PARMAR et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. PARMAR et al case, allowing the prosecution to use the seized materials as evidence. This decision is significant because it means the prosecution can continue to build its case against the defendants. The ruling will likely impact the defendants' ability to defend themselves.
info
Other
April 27, 2026
2:18-cr-00735-4 USA v. PARMAR et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. PARMAR et al case. The motion was filed by the defendants, who sought to exclude certain physical evidence from being used against them in their trial. The court's decision means that the evidence will be admissible in court.
Advertisement
newspaper
5 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
13 hours, 43 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.