USA v. Pacheco et al
Case Summary
USA v. Pacheco et al is tracked by Juryvine as a criminal case. The available record places the matter in W.D. Wash.. The docket number on file is 18-cr-05205. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:18-cr-05205-8 USA v. Pacheco et al
Other · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
Case Timeline
1 event3:18-cr-05205-8 USA v. Pacheco et al
The criminal case USA v. Pacheco et al is active in the Western District of Washington under docket number 18-cr-05205. The case is currently on hold for more substantial filings or rulings before further analysis can be provided. Juryvine is monitoring the case and will update as new information becomes available.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.