2:26-mj-01972-1 USA v. Montemayor-Cabreara
Financial Affidavit (CJA 23) - NFPV ( 9
The United States has filed a criminal action against Montemayor-Cabreara in the Central District of California. The docket shows a financial affidavit (CJA 23) for non-payment of fees.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-mj-01972-1 USA v. Montemayor-Cabreara
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Montemayor-Cabreara and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
USA v. Montemayor-Cabreara is an active criminal matter in Central District of California under docket 26-mj-01972.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Montemayor-Cabreara. Juryvine classifies the matter around criminal case, criminal law, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: An affidavit was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
An affidavit was filed.
Financial Affidavit (CJA 23) - NFPV ( 9
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
12 hours, 32 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.