legal-news

USA v. Lorne Johnson et al.

26-cr-10031 D. Mass.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Civil case in D. Mass. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:26-cr-10031-2 USA v. Lorne Johnson et al.. Coverage tracked from 3 media sources.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Mass.

District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-cr-10031-2 USA v. Lorne Johnson et al.

Other · May 01, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Lorne Johnson and others.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 1, 2026

1:26-cr-10031-2 USA v. Lorne Johnson et al.

A Notice of Rescheduling was filed.

info
Other May 1, 2026

1:26-cr-10031-3 USA v. Lorne Johnson et al.

A Notice of Rescheduling was filed.

info
Other May 1, 2026

1:26-cr-10031-4 USA v. Lorne Johnson et al.

A Notice of Rescheduling was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 3 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.