legal-news

USA v. Lolli et al

16-cr-00167
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The United States filed a lawsuit against Lolli and others in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is a criminal action, with the docket number 16-cr-00167. The court has not yet released a summary of the case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • criminal action
  • Southern District of New York
  • docket number 16-cr-00167
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 23, 2026

8:16-cr-00167-3 USA v. Lolli et al

The court denied the defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The motion was based on allegations that the warrant was issued without probable cause. The denial of the motion means that the evidence will be admissible in the trial.

info
Other April 23, 2026

8:16-cr-00167-2 USA v. Lolli et al

The court denied the defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The motion was based on allegations that the warrant was issued without probable cause. The denial of the motion means that the evidence will be admissible in the trial.

info
Other April 23, 2026

8:16-cr-00167-1 USA v. Lolli et al

The court granted a motion to seal the indictment in USA v. Lolli et al, case number 8:16-cr-00167-1. This means that the details of the charges against the defendants will be kept private for now. The court's decision is likely intended to protect the defendants' rights and prevent potential prejudice.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

12 hours, 50 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.