USA v. Knowles et al
Case Summary
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the case of USA v. Knowles et al (7:11-cr-00630-13). The motion was filed by the defendants, but the court ruled against them. This decision allows the prosecution to use the evidence against the defendants in the upcoming trial.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Case Timeline
20 events7:11-cr-00630-13 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the case of USA v. Knowles et al (7:11-cr-00630-13). The motion was filed by the defendants, but the court ruled against them. This decision allows the prosecution to use the evidence against the defendants in the upcoming trial.
7:11-cr-00630-14 USA v. Knowles et al
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of USA v. Knowles et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents are likely related to ongoing investigations or evidence that could compromise the case.
7:11-cr-00630-15 USA v. Knowles et al
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case USA v. Knowles et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents will not be publicly available.
7:11-cr-00630-16 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the case of USA v. Knowles et al (7:11-cr-00630-16). The motion was filed by the defendants, who sought to exclude certain physical evidence from being used against them in their trial. The court's decision means that the evidence will be admissible in court.
7:11-cr-00630-17 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the case of USA v. Knowles et al (7:11-cr-00630-17). The motion was filed by the defendants, who sought to exclude certain physical evidence from being used against them in their trial. The court's decision means that the evidence will be admissible in court.
7:11-cr-00630-18 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The motion was based on allegations that the warrant was issued without probable cause. The denial of the motion means that the evidence will be admissible in the trial.
7:11-cr-00630-19 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the case of USA v. Knowles et al (7:11-cr-00630-19). The motion was filed by the defendants, who sought to exclude physical evidence obtained during a search of their property. The court's decision allows the prosecution to use the evidence in their case against the defendants.
7:11-cr-00630-20 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the case of USA v. Knowles et al, a federal criminal case. The motion was filed by the defendants, who sought to exclude certain evidence obtained by law enforcement. The court's decision means that the evidence will be admissible in the trial.
7:11-cr-00630-21 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the case of USA v. Knowles et al (7:11-cr-00630-21). This decision allows the prosecution to use the disputed evidence against the defendants. The ruling is significant because it will impact the defendants' ability to defend themselves in the upcoming trial.
7:11-cr-00630-22 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the case of USA v. Knowles et al (7:11-cr-00630-22). This decision allows the prosecution to use the evidence against the defendants. The ruling is significant because it will impact the defendants' ability to defend themselves in the upcoming trial.
7:11-cr-00630-23 USA v. Knowles et al
The judge denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. Knowles et al case. This decision allows the prosecution to use the disputed evidence against the defendants. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving similar evidence.
7:11-cr-00630-3 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. Knowles et al case (7:11-cr-00630-3). The motion was filed by the defendants, who sought to exclude certain physical evidence from being used against them in their trial. The court's decision means that the evidence will be admissible in court.
7:11-cr-00630-47 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The motion was based on allegations that the warrant was issued without probable cause. The denial of the motion means that the evidence will be admissible in the trial.
7:11-cr-00630-43 USA v. Knowles et al
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of USA v. Knowles et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents will not be publicly available.
7:11-cr-00630-42 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. Knowles et al case, allowing the prosecution to use the seized materials against the defendants. This decision is significant because it allows the prosecution to proceed with their case, potentially leading to a conviction. The motion was likely based on claims that the evidence was obtained illegally.
7:11-cr-00630-41 USA v. Knowles et al
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case of USA v. Knowles et al, which means the document will not be publicly available. This decision was made to protect sensitive information. The sealing of the document will prevent public access to the information it contains.
7:11-cr-00630-40 USA v. Knowles et al
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of USA v. Knowles et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents will not be publicly available.
7:11-cr-00630-48 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The motion was based on allegations that the warrant was issued without probable cause. The denial of the motion means that the evidence will be admissible in the trial.
7:11-cr-00630-38 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. Knowles et al case (7:11-cr-00630-38). This decision allows the prosecution to use the disputed evidence against the defendants. The ruling is significant because it could impact the outcome of the trial.
7:11-cr-00630-36 USA v. Knowles et al
The court denied the motion to suppress evidence in the USA v. Knowles et al case (7:11-cr-00630-36). This decision allows the prosecution to use the disputed evidence against the defendants. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving similar evidence.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 40 articles
Timeline events
48 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.