USA v. Emad-Vaez et al
Case Summary
USA v. Emad-Vaez et al is tracked by Juryvine as a criminal case. The available record places the matter in N.D. Cal.. The docket number on file is 18-cr-00160. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:18-cr-00160-1 USA v. Emad-Vaez et al
Other · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event3:18-cr-00160-1 USA v. Emad-Vaez et al
The criminal case USA v. Emad-Vaez et al is currently under observation in the Northern District of California with docket number 18-cr-00160. No significant filings or rulings have been made public yet, so the case remains on watch for further developments. Juryvine will provide updates once more detailed court documents or media coverage become available.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
50 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.