criminal-case criminal-law federal-courts

Attorney appearance noted in US criminal case against De Jesus Garcia in Central District CA

25-cr-00669 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The United States prosecuted De Jesus Garcia in the Central District of California. The docket reflects an attorney appearance or reassignment for the Federal Public Defender's Office, indicating defense counsel involvement.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Criminal prosecution
  • Federal public defender
  • Counsel reassignment
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cr-00669-1 USA v. De Jesus Garcia

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes De Jesus Garcia and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

2:25-cr-00669-1 USA v. De Jesus Garcia

The Federal Public Defender's Office officially entered the case USA v. De Jesus Garcia, as recorded in docket 2:25-cr-00669-1. This means the defendant now has court-appointed legal representation. This matters because it ensures the defendant's right to counsel is secured moving forward.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 9 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.