hearing

USA v. Beaulieu et al

13-cr-20561
Active Hearing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

USA v. Beaulieu et al is a criminal case with a current docket number of 13-cr-20561. The case involves the revocation of supervised release, which is a serious development in the case. The revocation of supervised release suggests that the defendant has violated the terms of their release, which can result in additional penalties and consequences. This can be a significant development in the case, as it may indicate that the defendant is at risk of facing additional time in prison.

Latest development

1:13-cr-20561-4 USA v. Beaulieu et al

Hearing · April 24, 2026

The court held a final hearing to revoke the supervised release of Beaulieu et al, who were defendants in the case USA v. Beaulieu et al (1:13-cr-20561-4). The hearing concerned the revocation of their supervised release, which is a critical aspect of their post-sentencing supervision. The outcome of this hearing will determine the next steps in their case.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • revocation of supervised release
  • defendant's violation
  • additional penalties
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
groups
Hearing April 24, 2026

1:13-cr-20561-4 USA v. Beaulieu et al

The court held a final hearing to revoke the supervised release of Beaulieu et al, who were defendants in the case USA v. Beaulieu et al (1:13-cr-20561-4). The hearing concerned the revocation of their supervised release, which is a critical aspect of their post-sentencing supervision. The outcome of this hearing will determine the next steps in their case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 week, 2 days ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.