USA v. Anderson et al
Case Summary
USA v. Anderson et al is a criminal case with a docket number of 24-cr-00017. the current summary is unknown, and the court and specific details of the case are also unknown.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Criminal charges and procedural posture
- • Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims
- • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
Docket Snapshot
Court
D. Del.
District of Delaware · 3rd Circuit · DE
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cr-00017-3 USA v. Moise, et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Delaware, a federal district court in DE.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
USA v. Anderson et al is an active criminal matter in District of Delaware under docket 24-cr-00017.
The case is currently organized around Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Criminal charges and procedural posture, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The government submitted a receipt for a passport in the case of USA v. Anderson et al, specifically for defendant Moise. This filing is likely related to the defendants' travel history or potential flight risk.
The receipt may be used as evidence in the case. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The government received a passport from defendant Moise, which is a required document in a criminal case. This receipt is a procedural step in the case, indicating that the defendant has provided the necessary documentation.
The receipt does not indicate any. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to intervene in the case Britten v. Henderson et al, allowing the plaintiff to join the lawsuit.
This development is significant because it expands the scope of the case and may impact the outcome. The intervenor, Britten, will now. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case USA v. Anderson et al, citing concerns for witness safety and the integrity of the investigation. This decision allows the sealed documents to remain confidential, potentially impacting the.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
District of Delaware (D. Del.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, DE.
Case Timeline
4 events1:24-cr-00017-3 USA v. Moise, et al
The government received a passport from defendant Moise, which is a required document in a criminal case. This receipt is a procedural step in the case, indicating that the defendant has provided the necessary documentation. The receipt does not indicate any new developments in the case.
1:24-cr-00017-3 USA v. Moise, et al
The government submitted a receipt for a passport in the case of USA v. Anderson et al, specifically for defendant Moise. This filing is likely related to the defendants' travel history or potential flight risk. The receipt may be used as evidence in the case.
3:25-cv-50156 Britten v. Henderson et al
The court granted a motion to intervene in the case Britten v. Henderson et al, allowing the plaintiff to join the lawsuit. This development is significant because it expands the scope of the case and may impact the outcome. The intervenor, Britten, will now have a voice in the proceedings.
2:24-cr-00017-1 USA v. Anderson et al
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case USA v. Anderson et al, citing concerns for witness safety and the integrity of the investigation. This decision allows the sealed documents to remain confidential, potentially impacting the public's access to information about the case. The sealed documents may contain sensitive information that could compromise the investigation or put witnesses at risk.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
10 hours, 13 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.