criminal-case criminal-law government-litigation federal-courts court-watch

USA v. Anderson et al

24-cr-00017 D. Del.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

USA v. Anderson et al is a criminal case with a docket number of 24-cr-00017. the current summary is unknown, and the court and specific details of the case are also unknown.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Criminal charges and procedural posture
  • Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims
  • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Del.

District of Delaware · 3rd Circuit · DE

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:24-cr-00017-3 USA v. Moise, et al

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Delaware, a federal district court in DE.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 10 hours, 13 minutes ago

USA v. Anderson et al is an active criminal matter in District of Delaware under docket 24-cr-00017.

The case is currently organized around Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Criminal charges and procedural posture, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The government submitted a receipt for a passport in the case of USA v. Anderson et al, specifically for defendant Moise. This filing is likely related to the defendants' travel history or potential flight risk.

The receipt may be used as evidence in the case. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The government received a passport from defendant Moise, which is a required document in a criminal case. This receipt is a procedural step in the case, indicating that the defendant has provided the necessary documentation.

The receipt does not indicate any. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to intervene in the case Britten v. Henderson et al, allowing the plaintiff to join the lawsuit.

This development is significant because it expands the scope of the case and may impact the outcome. The intervenor, Britten, will now. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case USA v. Anderson et al, citing concerns for witness safety and the integrity of the investigation. This decision allows the sealed documents to remain confidential, potentially impacting the.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of Delaware (D. Del.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, DE.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

4 events
info
Other May 5, 2026

1:24-cr-00017-3 USA v. Moise, et al

The government received a passport from defendant Moise, which is a required document in a criminal case. This receipt is a procedural step in the case, indicating that the defendant has provided the necessary documentation. The receipt does not indicate any new developments in the case.

info
Other May 5, 2026

1:24-cr-00017-3 USA v. Moise, et al

The government submitted a receipt for a passport in the case of USA v. Anderson et al, specifically for defendant Moise. This filing is likely related to the defendants' travel history or potential flight risk. The receipt may be used as evidence in the case.

info
Other April 24, 2026

3:25-cv-50156 Britten v. Henderson et al

The court granted a motion to intervene in the case Britten v. Henderson et al, allowing the plaintiff to join the lawsuit. This development is significant because it expands the scope of the case and may impact the outcome. The intervenor, Britten, will now have a voice in the proceedings.

info
Other April 24, 2026

2:24-cr-00017-1 USA v. Anderson et al

The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case USA v. Anderson et al, citing concerns for witness safety and the integrity of the investigation. This decision allows the sealed documents to remain confidential, potentially impacting the public's access to information about the case. The sealed documents may contain sensitive information that could compromise the investigation or put witnesses at risk.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

4 records on file

Last updated

10 hours, 13 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.