criminal-case criminal-law federal-courts court-watch

USA v. AMERICAN EEL DEPOT CORP.

22-cr-00165 D.N.J.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court issued an order to continue the case due to the ends of justice. This decision was made to ensure that the case is heard in a timely manner and that justice is served. The court's order is in line with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which allow for continuances in certain circumstances.

Stage

Court order issued

Timeline

5 events

Coverage

5 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • ends of justice
  • continuance
  • Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:22-cr-00165-1 USA v. AMERICAN EEL DEPOT CORP.

Order · Apr 24, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

5 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 24, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes AMERICAN EEL DEPOT CORP and others.

Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 weeks, 2 days ago

The USA v. American Eel Depot Corp. case, docketed as 22-cr-00165, remains active with a judge yet to be assigned.

The court issued an order to continue the case due to the ends of justice, matching with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This decision aims to ensure the case is heard in a timely manner and that justice is served. The court's order was issued on April 24, 2026, with multiple orders issued on the same day.

The case's status and next steps will depend on the assigned judge's schedule and the parties' subsequent filings. The court's order to continue the case is a significant development, and the case's progression will be closely watched.

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure allow for continuances in certain circumstances, and the court's decision to continue the case is in line with these rules. The case's key issues revolve around the ends of justice, continuance, and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The court's order to continue the case is a critical step in the case's progression, and the parties will need to adjust their strategies accordingly. The case's next steps will depend on the assigned judge's schedule and the parties' subsequent filings.

The court's decision to continue the case will have a significant impact on the case's progression and the parties involved. The case's status and next steps will be closely watched as the case moves forward.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
gavel
Order April 24, 2026

2:22-cr-00165-1 USA v. AMERICAN EEL DEPOT CORP.

The court issued an order.

gavel
Order April 24, 2026

2:22-cr-00165-2 USA v. AMERICAN EEL DEPOT CORP.

The court issued an order.

gavel
Order April 24, 2026

2:22-cr-00165-3 USA v. AMERICAN EEL DEPOT CORP.

The court issued an order.

gavel
Order April 24, 2026

2:22-cr-00165-4 USA v. AMERICAN EEL DEPOT CORP.

The court issued an order.

gavel
Order April 24, 2026

2:22-cr-00165-5 USA v. AMERICAN EEL DEPOT CORP.

The court issued an order.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

5 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 5 articles

Timeline events

5 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 17 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.