0:03-cv-61156 United States v. Largie, et al
Satisfaction of Judgment ( 58
The United States satisfied a judgment against Largie and others under docket 03-cv-61156. This indicates resolution of the underlying claims or debts. The court is not identified.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
0:03-cv-61156 United States v. Largie, et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 0:03-cv-61156 United States and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
United States v. Largie, et al is an active criminal matter under docket 03-cv-61156.
The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 0:03-cv-61156 United States. The case is currently organized around Criminal charges and procedural posture, Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court entered judgment.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The court entered judgment.
Satisfaction of Judgment ( 58
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
22 hours, 12 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.